E-Performance Management System (e-PMS) as a Strategic Instrument: A Critical Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63141/gijbr-V1N1-2024ID11Keywords:
e-HRM, E-staffing system, Performance appraisal process, performance-oriented compensation strategies, e-employee assessment toolsAbstract
Managers utilize performance appraisals to emphasize both the strengths and weaknesses of employees, help them improve in areas needing development, and collaboratively establish career advancement goals. Traditional employee behavior and skills have been influenced by intense competition, emerging technologies, and process re-engineering. To meet these evolving demands, organizations are increasingly relying on communication technologies to assess and enhance employee performance and productivity. As the corporate landscape becomes more competitive, many companies find it challenging to allocate time for individual performance reviews and have turned to electronic performance appraisals instead.
Many organizations are now employing electronic performance management systems (e-PMS) to monitor employee performance. The term "e-performance management" describes how information technology is designed, implemented, and used through a performance management system (PMS). It is a subset of electronic human resource management (e-HRM) systems. By integrating IT into the performance management process, organizations can align their performance management strategies with their overall goals, policies, and practices. The relational aspect of e-HRM within e-performance management supports various business activities. However, leveraging technology to enhance human performance is a relatively new and poorly understood endeavor, posing challenges for many organizations.
The influence of e-PMS in the Indian context has not received much attention, according to a review of the literature. Therefore, this study aims to provide an overview of e-PMS, highlighting key concerns and strategic initiatives that Indian companies should consider when setting objectives to meet the needs and expectations of their workforce
Downloads
References
• Al-Raisi, A., Amin, S., & Tahir, S. (2011), Evaluation of e-performance analysis and assessment in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Organizations, Journal of Internet & Information System, 2(2), 20 –27.
• Bharti, P. (2015). Impact of E-HRM System on Organizational Performance: A Case Study on Banking Sector. International Conference of Advance Research and Innovation (ICARI-2015), 202-204
• Bhattacharyya, D.K. (2017). Performance Management Systems and Strategies. O’Reilly
• Frayne J. M., &Geringer M. J. 1995. A social cognitive approach to examine joint venture general manager performance. Group and Organizational Management,19: 240–262.
• Holland, PJ, Cooper, B & Hecker, R 2015, ‘Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: the effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type’, Personnel Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 161-175.
• Jarrar, Y., &Schiuma, G. (2007). Measuring performance in the public sector: challenges and trends. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(4), 4-8.
• Kariznoee, A., Afshani, M., &Moghadam, M. R. H. (2012). The examine of effect of E-HRM on employee’s job performance. Advanced Research in Economic and Management Sciences (AREMS), 6, 275-282.
• Khashman, A. M., & Al-Ryalat, H. A. (2015). The impact of electronic human resource management (E-HRM) practices on business performance in Jordanian telecommunications sector: The employees perspective. Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 115-129.
• Kundu, S. C., &Kadian, R. (2012). Applications of HRIS in human resource management in India: A study. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(21), 34-41
• Lloyd, V. (2016). Five key benefits of Electronic Performance Review. CIPD
• Ravisha, B., &Pakkeerappa, P. (2013). E- Performance Management. Mangalore University, India
• Odhiambo, W., &Kamau, P. (2013). Public Procurement: Lessons from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. OECD Working Paper NO.208. OECD Development Centre. on http/www.wto.org, on 15th Dec. 2009
• Onnasch, L, Wickens, CD, Li, H &Manzey, D 2014, ‘Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: an integrated meta-analysis’, Human Factors, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 476-488.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
data is available
License
Copyright (c) 2024 GSB Insight: Journal of Business and Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.